India · English
Rajasthan HC Row: Justice Mehta’s allegations against Justice Sharma, CJI’s response - All you need to know
Chief Justice Surya Kant stated that Justice Mehta's allegations against Justice Sharma cannot be decided publicly; the judge must be given a fair opportunity before any conclusion is reached.
Read the full report at Livemint →
Also covered by
- Hindustan Times India: ‘Hit sixes’ before retirement’: SC judge seeks Rajasthan HC Acting CJ’s removal
- Indian Express: ‘Doubts on integrity’: Supreme Court judge on Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice
- Free Press Journal: 'Misusing Powers': SC Judge Writes To CJI Surya Kant Seeking Replacement Of Rajasthan HC Acting CJ Over 'Manipulation Case Listings'
- Siasat Daily (EN): Misuse of power: SC judge seeks ouster of Rajasthan Chief Justice
- Indian Express: Today News Headlines for School Assembly, August 27, 2026: Flash floods hit Nepal, 105 Indians missing; SC judge asks for transfer of acting Rajasthan HC judge
- OpIndia: SC judge seeks replacement of Rajasthan HC acting CJ: What happened, what he alleged and everything you need to know
- Indian Express: Day before allegations against Rajasthan judge, lawyers wanted him out
- The Hindu BusinessLine: SC Judge seeks transfer of Rajasthan HC acting Chief Justice
- New Indian Express: SC judge Justice Sandeep Mehta flags misuse of office by Rajasthan HC Acting CJ, asks CJI to replace him
- Hindustan Times India: 'Allegations can't be treated as finding': CJI on SC judge seeking removal of Rajasthan HC acting Chief Justice
- New Indian Express: SC judge flags alleged misuse of office by Acting CJ of Rajasthan HC; CJI says allegations are not findings
- NDTV India: "Won't Decide Via Media": Chief Justice On Allegations Against Rajasthan Judge
About this page
AKHBAARI groups the same story across publishers so you can see who is reporting it and how they differ. The summary above is machine-generated from the publisher's own feed text and is labelled as such. The full report stays with the publisher, who holds copyright in it. See our editorial policy.